

Can you combine all that stuff into one easy to understand post?

Posted 11 February 2008 - 02:10 PM
Posted 11 February 2008 - 04:28 PM
(3) Perhaps SC's 2nd set of legs were part of the same (potential) mold as the other part 21 non-MUSCLE sculpts
Posted 11 February 2008 - 08:47 PM
Posted 12 February 2008 - 06:19 AM
Edited by Soupie, 12 February 2008 - 06:29 AM.
Posted 12 February 2008 - 09:29 AM
Posted 12 February 2008 - 09:35 AM
Oh, yeah. It supports URS's theory.
Posted 12 February 2008 - 09:55 AM
Posted 12 February 2008 - 10:16 AM
Posted 12 February 2008 - 12:19 PM
Posted 12 February 2008 - 12:26 PM
Edited by arforbes, 12 February 2008 - 12:28 PM.
Posted 12 February 2008 - 02:20 PM
Whoa! Good analysis, arforbes! AndForgive me if this was already addressed but Satancross also has no sprue hole where the legs might have been attached - which differs completely from SHA and BHS. Also if you look on Naochin's site ALL the SC pics in each color are shown with legs simply standing next to the figure, never attached. So yes, legs made separately for sure = highly likely. On a different tree though? Hard to say.
http://ulala69.hp.in...o.jp/part21.htm
Posted 12 February 2008 - 02:53 PM
Whoa! Good analysis, arforbes! And
to the fact the other people besides URS and I are starting to talk about the trees and molding process!
Edited by matthewf1tz, 12 February 2008 - 02:54 PM.
Posted 13 February 2008 - 12:56 PM
Whoa! Good analysis, arforbes! AndForgive me if this was already addressed but Satancross also has no sprue hole where the legs might have been attached - which differs completely from SHA and BHS. Also if you look on Naochin's site ALL the SC pics in each color are shown with legs simply standing next to the figure, never attached. So yes, legs made separately for sure = highly likely. On a different tree though? Hard to say.
http://ulala69.hp.in...o.jp/part21.htmto the fact the other people besides URS and I are starting to talk about the trees and molding process!
Posted 13 February 2008 - 02:38 PM
Posted 13 February 2008 - 03:03 PM
Posted 13 February 2008 - 05:37 PM
Posted 13 February 2008 - 05:52 PM
But still, Jkaris, it's the fact that those two sculpts appear to be on the same frame. Can you identify the one sculpt Matthew couldn't? If they originally came from two different trees/family molds, the fact that they are now together suggests individual molds can be swapped around!Re-issue plastic, I have one of those sets.
Posted 13 February 2008 - 06:03 PM
Posted 13 February 2008 - 06:08 PM
Right, but consider the fact that switching our specific cavities is probably very time consuming and potentially disruptive to the family mold balance (if a completely different cavity is put in its place). Perhaps they only swapped cavities in extreme cases -- to replace a worn one, or for a re-release set.I'd like to add, that if the singular molds could be switched out at all, then there would more than likely be no noticeable color code or tree information. I don't believe in the multi piece Tree molds, and never have. Just my two cents.
It just doesn't seem remotely feasible to me.
Posted 13 February 2008 - 07:32 PM
Posted 13 February 2008 - 08:37 PM
Posted 13 February 2008 - 08:48 PM