Hasbro and Lucasfilm (Toy Opinions)
#26
Posted 10 February 2003 - 12:45 PM
-Nathan
#28 Guest_General Veers_*
Posted 10 February 2003 - 03:02 PM
#30 Guest_General Veers_*
Posted 11 February 2003 - 06:56 AM
#31
Posted 14 February 2003 - 11:04 AM
New Removable Helmet Vader
Of course, this one's DRASTICALLY DIFFERENT from the previous version! It will have a lightsaber throwing action... that won't work well and will throw the lightsaber approximately two inches. Sarcasm aside, there's also a new Snowtrooper that's the exact same concept as the original deluxe version.
I think this is what the SW line needs more of. Ideas that are fun, rather than movie accurate.
I agree that the emphasis should be on "fun". I loved those mini-rigs back in the day. They're small enough so that you can have fun with them, but their designs are close enough to the movies that they can look like Star Wars toys. But I doubt that collectors will go for toys that aren't based on designs from the movies or from the Expanded Universe materials, so oh well...
-Nathan
#32 Guest_General Veers_*
Posted 14 February 2003 - 11:39 AM
Why would they do this?
SLAP!
I don't know what they are thinking here? Let's think about this figure as a toy for a moment. Besides the figure being Darth Vader, what is the added play value of taking off his helmet?
Executive 1: “I know we could put out another version of Vader. And you could take of his helmet, again.”
Executive 2: “That’s great! I love it!”
Executive 3: “I don’t know? We’ve really already done this figure? Couldn’t we do something new?”
Executive 1: “We could give him an action feature.”
Executive 3: “GREAT! That’s the new kind of thinking we need!”
Executive 2: “He’s really good. How does he come up with this stuff?”
Seriously, what is the added play value? So kids can recreate the emotional moment of Luke’s final talk with his father as the Death Star is being attacked. Wow, fun! Even for collector, what’s new about this? The pose is a little different and it has an action feature, but so what?
This line needs some new life. Could Hasbro really be out of ideas?
SLAP!
#33 Guest_General Veers_*
Posted 19 February 2003 - 12:14 PM
http://starwars.hasb....cfm?showlg=222
The other 2 "new" figures look alright.
I like the base that Wedding Dress Padme comes with.
What do you think Tortle?
SLAP!
#34
Posted 19 February 2003 - 12:43 PM
As for Amidala and Wat Tambor, they're pretty much the same ol' crap: action figures that would be interesting if you could actually move them, but you can't since they have plastic capes or a plastic robes. Whatever happened to soft goods?
SLAP!
-Nathan
#35
Posted 19 February 2003 - 12:44 PM
Who is Wat Tambor? I read the desription but where in the movie is he?
#36 Guest_General Veers_*
Posted 19 February 2003 - 12:53 PM
#37 Guest_General Veers_*
Posted 19 February 2003 - 12:58 PM
I agree that plastic is not the way to go. Soft goods kill the plastic versions. But as long as Hasbro keeps producing “statues” then they will keep using plastic. Why? Because they can’t get their soft goods to look good. Most specifically the Jedi robes from the accessory packs (horrible!) and Obi-Wan’s cape. Both of those looked really bad. But Padme’s wedding dress would have been too expensive, and looked terrible if it was soft goods. The dress was to light and sheer to be a soft good.
SLAP!
And for the last post too…
SLAP!
#39 Guest_General Veers_*
Posted 19 February 2003 - 04:31 PM
#41 Guest_General Veers_*
Posted 20 February 2003 - 07:04 AM
Read Adamantiumwulf's question again. He asked about WAT TAMBOR, he appears to know who Coleman is.
#42
Posted 20 February 2003 - 08:44 AM
But that is bad when I didn't even use Coleman's last name and I am quoted as useing such.
Coleman Trebor Wat Tambor
hmmm trebor Tambor They sorta are the same.....
Ok not really.
Some people like to be difficult
#43 Guest_General Veers_*
Posted 20 February 2003 - 09:02 AM
Hopefully I answered your question.
#45
Posted 20 February 2003 - 12:01 PM
I don't have a clue who What is. Was he covering second base?He asked about COLEMAN TREBOR, he appears to know who What is.
That's what I've been saying!!
You haven't said a darn thing. You typed every letter of it and I have witness's. Anyways your WRONG.
#46
Posted 20 February 2003 - 01:31 PM
Who's on first.I don't have a clue who What is. Was he covering second base?He asked about COLEMAN TREBOR, he appears to know who What is.
You haven't said a darn thing. You typed every letter of it and I have witness's. Anyways your WRONG.That's what I've been saying!!
What's on second.
I Don't Know's on third.
Today is pitching.
Tomorrow is catching.
I Don't Give a Damn is playing Left Field...
#47
Posted 20 February 2003 - 02:22 PM
ExactlyWho's on first.
What's on second.
I Don't Know's on third.
Today is pitching.
Tomorrow is catching.
I Don't Give a Damn is playing Left Field...
#49
Posted 21 February 2003 - 06:34 AM
Yes he is dead.Yes.
Coleman Trebor
#50 Guest_General Veers_*
Posted 21 February 2003 - 08:24 AM
What about the new "commando" Clone Troopers?
I think we'll get them, but it could turn out very strange. It will be "realistic" figures based on cartoons.