The year/month graph was simply done by getting the average of each of the values each month. If you guys have questions or suggestions, then please let me know.
Attached Files
-
Satan_Cross_Price_Graphs.doc 37.5K
25 downloads
“How Much Are MUSCLE’s Worth?”
Started by
Guest_General Veers_*
, Mar 09 2004 01:40 PM
31 replies to this topic
#26
Guest_General Veers_*
Guest_General Veers_*
-
- Guests
Posted 27 October 2005 - 12:50 PM
Well, here's what I threw together. It should make sense if you've read my other posts.
The year/month graph was simply done by getting the average of each of the values each month. If you guys have questions or suggestions, then please let me know.
The year/month graph was simply done by getting the average of each of the values each month. If you guys have questions or suggestions, then please let me know.
#27
fwgeneral
-
- Members
-
- 10 posts
Budding Collector
Posted 28 October 2005 - 05:39 PM
That's terrific analysis
#28
Guest_General Veers_*
Guest_General Veers_*
-
- Guests
Posted 05 April 2007 - 12:49 PM
Well, I've made my final update. You can check it out on my website. The data runs from April 2003 through April 2007.
There are some other changes and updates to the site, but the SC Math is probably the biggest change.
There are some other changes and updates to the site, but the SC Math is probably the biggest change.
#29
Universal Ruler Supreme
-
- Legends
-
- 5641 posts
普遍的な主権者
- Gender:Male
- Location:South Carolina
- Interests:Getting stuff as cheap as possible...........and food.<br /><br />^ Not much has changed in the past few years.
Posted 05 April 2007 - 02:54 PM
I've always wondered what you exactly meant by "negative values". Are these values referring to shipping charges and the such? You may have explained it, but I probably overlooked it somewhere. 
#30
Guest_General Veers_*
Guest_General Veers_*
-
- Guests
Posted 06 April 2007 - 05:38 AM
When I try to account for the prices of other figures (either $0.50 or $0.75), it doesn’t work if the figures sold for less than that.
I think it’s easier if I just show you the math, because it’s hard to explain.
Auction 1
43 Figures with a SC for $50.99
42 Figures multiplied by $0.50 = $21.00
So $50.99 - $21.00 = $29.99 (the price for the remaining one figure [SC])
Auction 2
178 Figures with a SC for $66.00
177 Figures multiplied by $.50 = $88.50
So $66.00 - $88.50 = -$22.50 (the price for the SC)
Because the figures sold for less then $0.50, the math doesn’t work.
Does that make sense?
I think it’s easier if I just show you the math, because it’s hard to explain.
Auction 1
43 Figures with a SC for $50.99
42 Figures multiplied by $0.50 = $21.00
So $50.99 - $21.00 = $29.99 (the price for the remaining one figure [SC])
Auction 2
178 Figures with a SC for $66.00
177 Figures multiplied by $.50 = $88.50
So $66.00 - $88.50 = -$22.50 (the price for the SC)
Because the figures sold for less then $0.50, the math doesn’t work.
Does that make sense?
#31
Universal Ruler Supreme
-
- Legends
-
- 5641 posts
普遍的な主権者
- Gender:Male
- Location:South Carolina
- Interests:Getting stuff as cheap as possible...........and food.<br /><br />^ Not much has changed in the past few years.
Posted 06 April 2007 - 06:52 PM
O.k. I understand it now! Thanks for clearing that up.
#32
Articulationnut
-
- Members
-
- 1732 posts
Toy Addict
Posted 09 April 2007 - 09:40 PM
This came in handy today... 
Divide & conquer works because of attachments people make to push-button issues, individual "leaders," parties, clans, tribes, policies, or agendas, leaving them open to manipulation.
