I punched mine.They are all unpunched too.
A few times hahaah.
I also folded the corners in and stepped on it to make it look more authentic and used.
Posted 16 November 2005 - 08:39 AM
I punched mine.They are all unpunched too.
Posted 16 November 2005 - 09:34 AM
Posted 16 November 2005 - 05:07 PM
Posted 16 November 2005 - 06:33 PM
Posted 16 November 2005 - 08:19 PM
That I haven't been able to figure out yet. I am thinking that he was a special sculpt available in a set in Japan, like a ring or something. But that is only speculation.Here's a question though. Where does that Buffaloman that comes with the wrestling ring come from if he was never a kinkeshi sculpt?
Posted 16 November 2005 - 10:41 PM
Possibly this figure does not exist as a Kinkeshi? It is conceivable that Mattel produced the figure just for the board game and wrestling ring. I think that if this is true, it is a very interesting aspect of the M.U.S.C.L.E. toyline.That I haven't been able to figure out yet. I am thinking that he was a special sculpt available in a set in Japan, like a ring or something. But that is only speculation.Here's a question though. Where does that Buffaloman that comes with the wrestling ring come from if he was never a kinkeshi sculpt?
I will say this, in my 3+ years of buying stuff off of Yahoo JP, I have never seen a Kinkeshi version.
Edited by arforbes, 16 November 2005 - 10:41 PM.
Posted 17 November 2005 - 04:34 AM
Posted 17 November 2005 - 09:19 PM
Posted 18 November 2005 - 12:53 AM
Posted 22 November 2005 - 07:10 PM
Great, just what we need: another Mattel MUSCLE mystery.They could have made a new sculpt and mold and then sent it to Japan to be produced but still, why spend the enormous cost on a single fig when they had 300 plus to choose from. Their are tons of figs that fit in those prongs.
Posted 23 November 2005 - 12:17 AM
Posted 23 November 2005 - 06:36 AM
1) There really isn't any evidence for this besides their rarity.They weren't recalled, they just decided to stop production on SHA and BHS early on, before any lawsuit problems arose from the small parts.
Why would they not just have removed BHS's chest insert if they were removing SC's back half?They just removed the back half of SC in the Japanese factories so they could fit in the American 4-pack packaging.
It's likely that the poster with all the many figures on it had absolutely nothing to do with the actual American MUSCLEs to be produced. (Note the American commercial that featured Kinkeshi.) I really don't think it offers any insight into why SHA, BHS, and SC (not to mention DM and DE) are not on the later, official MUSCLE poster.When the poster proposal on the 28 packs featuring many more characters came out.
I agree that DM and DE are not confirmed, but the fact that your theory doesn't have an answer for them is a flaw, I think.As for DM and DE, I personally don't feel these have been authenticated as MUSCLEs.
Was the Flesh poster not available at the start of the MUSCLE release?and no reason for them to be on the poster.
Posted 23 November 2005 - 10:03 AM
True. It's just a theory.1) There really isn't any evidence for this besides their rarity.
The toy wasn't canceled, just 2 out of 235 were stopped being produced. There is no record of the first wave of GI joe figures from 1982 being cancelled but production was stopped on them by 1983. And we have no surviving records from Mattel regarding MUSCLE at all.2) There is actually evidence against this as there is no record of Mattel cancelling production-level toys.
Well the reason why I don't feel compelled to have to include them is because, take all the MUSCLEs the members of this board have. Add that to all the lots we've seen on E-bay. What's that, 50,000 MUSCLEs? And there is only 1 of each of DM and DE. That's 5 times rare than the MUSCLE Hauler, which was only a prototype. And why do they just happened to be owned by:3) Despite your opinion of DM and DE, their existence does challenge this theory -- as has been said before.
It just makes me a bit sceptical.User ID Bid Amount Date of bid
yapiel ( 1 ) $910.00 Jan-17-05 18:14:44 PST
phillymadison ( 328) $900.00 Jan-17-05 18:14:57 PST
They wouldn't have to remove BHS' attachment to fit him in the packaging. When they decided they didn't want the trouble with the small parts, it would be easy to just not include thoe figs in the line.Why would they not just have removed BHS's chest insert if they were removing SC's back half?
They probably didn't throw them away. SC back half was probably recycled. Then eventually they figured, why bother? It's not like anyones going to miss him considering we didn't know who any of the figs were anyways.If anything, they would have fixed the molds to simply not produce the SC back half and the BHS plug, rather than throw those pieces away after production.
It's not to drastic to stop producing 1 fig. It' would be more drastinc to resculpt them to include them when there were plenty of other unused figs. And they did can SC. Just later on after BHS and SHA because it was for a different reason. It's conceivable with so many figures to start with they could have made adjustments to their thinking of which ones should be included during that first year of production.Seems kind of drastic to just totally can the figure, especially since they didn't can Satan Cross.
The proposal poster on the 28 packs and the commercial using kinkeshi were made during the early stages before thing were completely finalized. When the "actual" poster was produced in 86' the line was finalized.It's likely that the poster with all the many figures on it had absolutely nothing to do with the actual American MUSCLEs to be produced. (Note the American commercial that featured Kinkeshi.) I really don't think it offers any insight into why SHA, BHS, and SC (not to mention DM and DE) are not on the later, official MUSCLE poster.
If DM and DE are actual MUSCLEs they can also have their own reason for rarity. There can be as many different reasons as there are figures. There doesn't have to be one single reason that covers every oddity in an entire toyline.Arforbes and Philly have shared very convincing, detailed pictures of both DM and DE. In my opinion, it is possible to tell the difference between a Kinkeshi and a MUSCLE via a picture.
Thanks! This is fun.First off, let me say welcome to the wonderful world of theorizing!
Posted 23 November 2005 - 10:06 AM
The other thought about this theory is this: Would a company such as Mattel really make such a blunder?They weren't recalled, they just decided to stop production on SHA and BHS early on, before any lawsuit problems arose from the small parts.
Posted 23 November 2005 - 11:48 AM
Posted 23 November 2005 - 03:15 PM
The other thought about this theory is this: Would a company such as Mattel really make such a blunder?
Are we saying they okayed these two figures for production and then a month or so later said, "wait, they may be dangerous."
Seems unlikely to me. They would have known up front that they were dangerous and simply not made any.
Talking about Star Wars and blunders: The initial batch of Star Wars figures only contained 12 figures. Sometime after they hit the market they stopped production on the cloth robed Jawa and started replacing it with a vinyl caped fig. Here is a change in a major toyline consisting of only 12 figures. Wouldn't it be conceivable to make a few minor adjustments to a toyline with 230 plus figs. And wasn't it Star Wars that advertised and developed the missle firing Boba Fett that was then altered before production to not fire the missle due to potential lawsuits? Why? My Transformers figures had firing missles. And wasn't it Star Wars that released a small blue Snaggletooth figure to the market before realizing he had to be completly resculpted and repainted and rereleased again, because they didn't have adequette reference material the first time? And wasn't it Star Wars that had to rerelease a new Han Solo with a newly sculpted head because the first one was way too small for his body? The point isn't why these figs were removed from the toyline, the point is that they were removed and it took place during the first year. Here is the evidence. Mattel released 3 pieces of proof that they were tinkering with the eventual choice of figures during the first year of production.Remember the era MUSCLE was being made. SW toys were loaded with small parts, GI Joe too, so it’s unlikely that Mattel was worried about children choking on small parts. Especially on a toy line that was given a relatively small launch (e.g. no cartoon, no back story, etc.).
Posted 23 November 2005 - 04:10 PM
I do think we have the super rare theory backwards.
It makes a lot more sense than a toyline to start with over 230 figs in it's first wave, then be followed by a second wave consisting of only 3 figs that all happen to have an attachment but be immediately stopped after a few hit the market and replaced with the first wave in multicolors, just so they can somehow slip in during the time period after the poster and before the multicolored.
If you've read the entire second post in this thread, then you know that AKIA members have considered many different theories over the years (including the extra/small parts theory), and that "we" know the answer may be a mixture of all the theories listed in the second post.If DM and DE are actual MUSCLEs they can also have their own reason for rarity. There can be as many different reasons as there are figures. There doesn't have to be one single reason that covers every oddity in an entire toyline.
Posted 23 November 2005 - 04:34 PM
Posted 23 November 2005 - 05:22 PM
Sure will...as soon as he arrives. Remind me, alright? I think you will be able to clearly see the difference between Kinkeshi and M.U.S.C.L.E. I just wish everyone could hold one to see for themselves.That being said perhaps Arforbes would be willing to show us a comparison picture when he receives his recently won Kinkeshi DE in the mail.
Posted 23 November 2005 - 08:21 PM
Posted 24 November 2005 - 05:06 AM
I'm not exactly sure how MUSCLE sales fluctuated, but I don't think it is how you theorized. I think they did surprisingly well right away, and then plummeted quickly.Then as it started to die again they took a leap of faith by introducing the colored figures to recoup the draining interest. Seems to me that they had already decided that the line wasn't worth the extra cost of adding new figures and striking new molds, so they pulled the rares to prevent slight confusion,
Posted 24 November 2005 - 09:20 AM
Posted 24 November 2005 - 09:49 AM
Yeah me too. I only got about 60 and all my friends got as many or less in 1986. Then everyone just stopped. It was a new inexpensive cool thing to collect. We saw the commercial, then we got some at the store, then some bootlegs out of the gumball machine. We'd trade to get rid of duplicates and try to get different figs, but there were so many too buy on our small allowances that we kind of gave up. We had kind of moved on to Thundercats or something when the multicoloreds came out, but by then it just seemed like no way of catching up.Personally I just don't think the line did Too well in the beginning or the end. I admit just about everybody had one of these things where I lived, but not every kid would buy 200 or more figures. Most of the auctions that pop up on eBay from peoples childhood collections only have 20-50 figs per bunch.
Posted 24 November 2005 - 07:00 PM
If you've read some of the excellent information on Veer's site (Rare MUSCLE Stuff) you know that MUSCLE was rated a top ten selling toy by Playthings Magazine in 1986 and by 1988 was no longer even featured in the Mattel catalog.Personally I just don't think the line did Too well in the beginning or the end.
Posted 28 November 2005 - 02:26 PM
First, thanks for the nod about the sales issue.Perhaps Mattel convinced Bandai to just make the two ring figures as American MUSCLEs, and not release them as Kinkeshi. In other words, Bandai was still making new sculpts and molds. So producing two as only MUSCLEs is not out of the question -- it just doesn't make sense. Unless the two ring figures have no real connection to the manga and Bandai didn't want to make them as Kinkeshi.