Last year, around this time, I had reached out to some board members to help me find some insects for an entomology course I was taking in school. The class and project went well but I recently realized I never shared my insect collection with you all. I had to purchase the glass cabinet to store them in. Most people used cardboard boxes that were provided. I guess I went a little over the top. I wanted to be able to store them, keep them safe and be able to display everything. I understand that this might not be for everyone but for those interested check it out and enjoy!
Here is the overview shot of the insects that you are able to pin. Others are meant to be stored in an alcohol solution. This would be most larvae, soft bodied insects and most arachnids. Starting from upper left to right and down, they are in what is recognized as the phylogenetic order/evolutionary history.
IMG_2487.JPG 95.83K 13 downloads
So the Odonates (dragonflies, damsel flies) are accepted to be some of the first true insects. Then Plecoptera (stone flies). Pictured is both the larval husk and adult. They actually leave the water as juveniles and climb ashore to hatch. The husks are commonly found on long blades of grass or sticks near the waters edge.
IMG_2488.JPG 62.09K 14 downloads IMG_2489.JPG 65.72K 9 downloads
Then the ear wigs, mantids, and cockroaches - I was able to pin the fleshy cockroach by removing its innards, which smelt horrid. Next is the group of Orthoptera (crickets, grasshoppers).
IMG_2490.JPG 64.2K 7 downloads
Then would be the rather diverse order of Hemiptera. Within Hemiptera is probably my favorite group, Heteroptera. Pictured here is a waterscorpion I captured (Nepidae- also my online poker name haha - its nasty little claws are used for snatching up prey). These guys live on blades of grass in the water and are able to get air down to themselves via capillary action using the protrusions (cerci) extending from its backside. Note the red specs on its thorax and legs. Those are mites... I unfortunately do not currently have an example but Belostomatids (toe biters) are closely related to the waterscorpions. They really have to be the most disturbing insect I have encountered. They live in the water but also are quite capable of living on land for brief periods of time. They get their name because they have been known to bite people on the feet/toes when they enter and exit the water. They have what some people describe as the most painful bite in the inset world and are capable of taking down snakes, turtles and larger prey. Sometimes they play dead to come alive and bite you! They also carry their young on their backs which looks quite disturbing.
Waterscorpion (not the toe biter)
IMG_2491.JPG 127.89K 7 downloads IMG_2492.JPG 66.12K 7 downloads
Coleoptera (beetles) is probably the most diverse order that exists. As you can see they vary greatly. Coleoptera means "sheathed wing" because the hard outer pair (elytra) is one pair of its wings, the other being tucked underneath which they use to fly. This is why they are not real dynamic fliers like some of the other insects you see zipping and buzzing around. Somewhere around 30-50% of described insects belong to the beetles. The beetle under "Meloidae" in the picture is a blister beetle and this group gets its name due to the cantharidan it releases when threatened. This burns the skin, hence blister beetle.
IMG_2493.JPG 98.71K 7 downloads
Next is Lepidoptera, the butterflies and moths. They really began to diversify harmoniously with the rise of angiosperms (flowering plants). Moths, like butterflies sip nectar from flowers. The larger ones in my collection belong to the family Sphingidae or sphynx/hawk moths. This is is the same group of moth that is in Silence of the Lambs... the Deaths's Head Moth. It got this common nickname from what appears to be a skull on the thorax. Some are capable of hovering mid-flight in order to sip nectar from flowers. Some moth and flower species are extreme examples of symbiotic relationships. The plant stores its nectar so far down in the flowers the proboscis (long protrusion from the moths head in the third picture) needs to be very long. The plant/flowers continue to mutate and over a long period of time the nectar becomes less accessible. Simultaneously the moths' species proboscis grows longer and longer to keep up. Soon enough the only one that can reach the nectar and consequentially, ability to pollinate the flower is this species of moth. At the same time the only nectar the moth's proboscis can functionally obtain is this one species of plant -runaway evolution!
IMG_2494.JPG 86.04K 7 downloads IMG_2495.JPG 73.92K 6 downloads IMG_2497.JPG 75.54K 9 downloads
And finally the most recently evolved, the Hymenoptera. Again these are the true bread winners of the angiosperms. This consists of the bees, ants, wasps and the like. This last picture embodies my other favorite group, the Ichneumonids! These things are awesome!! They are considered the parasitic wasps. They attack other groups of insects (most of the time VERY specifically - like the moth and flower). They sniff out a host and deposit their eggs in them. Most of the time they find a host during a stage of immaturity in its life cycle. This is usually during the pupae or larval stages, like a caterpillar. In some cases the host continues to live while the immature wasp(s) grow inside them. The host is essentially a zombie until the Ichneumonid is ready to hatch out and join the big, ugly world. The host usually perishes. One life given, taken really, for another.
IMG_2499.JPG 166.54K 9 downloads
Charles Darwin was so perplexed by the notion of a creator he used the Ichneumonids as an example as he wrote to a colleague:
"There seems to me too much misery in the world. I cannot persuade myself that a beneficent & omnipotent God would have designedly created the Ichneumonidæ with the express intention of their feeding within the living bodies of caterpillars, or that a cat should play with mice. Not believing this, I see no necessity in the belief that the eye was expressly designed. On the other hand I cannot anyhow be contented to view this wonderful universe & especially the nature of man, & to conclude that everything is the result of brute force. I am inclined to look at everything as resulting from designed laws, with the details, whether good or bad, left to the working out of what we may call chance. Not that this notion at all satisfies me. I feel most deeply that the whole subject is too profound for the human intellect. A dog might as well speculate on the mind of Newton.— Let each man hope & believe what he can.—
Edited by Screamer, 22 June 2015 - 09:57 PM.