Jump to content

Theme© by Fisana
 

Photo
- - - - -

A question about value


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 Trench

Trench

    Budding Collector

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 27 posts

Posted 29 June 2017 - 03:49 AM

So for most of the 70 something battle beasts that I have collected, very few are the quality that you collectors probably have in your collections. I have some doubles and triples from buying lots. If I were to pull aside the best of those doubles or triples to start a collection, which are better for a collection between no rub, non working rub or paint loss? I would think best paint. I know about the replacement rubs so I'm just curious. Thanks.
Thanks for any insight or advice.

Edited by Trench, 29 June 2017 - 03:55 AM.

  • 0





#2 Draznar

Draznar

    LRG Elite

  • LRG Council
  • 4851 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ontario, Canada
  • Interests:Battle Beasts and Boba Fett!

Posted 29 June 2017 - 05:38 AM

I would argue that paint matters most. You can replace the rubs, or even have figures with out rubs!


  • 0

#3 Trench

Trench

    Budding Collector

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 27 posts

Posted 30 June 2017 - 03:21 AM

I thought so as well. Thanks.
  • 0

#4 Jabroniville

Jabroniville

    Serious Collector

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 147 posts

Posted 30 June 2017 - 04:55 AM

Yeah, I'd generally agree. "No Rub" tends to offer a discount of about five bucks (Canadian; probably less in the US), but paint loss is a much harder thing to ignore. Though I'm decent enough at painting and color-matching to make up for that (except for that freakin' Anteater and that weird green :)!).


  • 0

#5 Trench

Trench

    Budding Collector

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 27 posts

Posted 30 June 2017 - 05:21 AM

LOL! The anteater is one of my most disliked color combos.
  • 0






Copyright © 2017 LittleRubberGuys.com