
So he will be for sale next week.


Posted 04 March 2013 - 05:35 PM
Posted 04 March 2013 - 05:54 PM
Posted 13 March 2013 - 12:36 AM
Posted 17 March 2013 - 11:30 AM
Posted 17 March 2013 - 11:34 AM
Posted 17 March 2013 - 11:36 AM
Trying to go around and give everyone a heads up that topps contacted me again with a cease and desist on anything GPK related. So I will not be promoting or selling anymore custom cheap toys in my store.
Posted 17 March 2013 - 11:47 AM
How do these guys found out about this stuff? Do they employ someone to trawl around looking for it or what?
Posted 17 March 2013 - 11:51 AM
I blame George Gaspar, but then again, I blame him for everything.... It was either him or Ironoak.
Everything is their respective faults.
Posted 17 March 2013 - 12:16 PM
How do these guys found out about this stuff? Do they employ someone to trawl around looking for it or what?
Posted 17 March 2013 - 12:59 PM
George strikes me as the type of person who gets a little too 'passionate' about stuff, but I couldn't see him flagging people out to companies. Of course, I don't know the guy, and maybe if what Eric said is correct, and a GPKCT line is in the works, he may be involved somehow.
Posted 17 March 2013 - 06:08 PM
Posted 17 March 2013 - 06:20 PM
Imperfecz Imperfecz Store Old Ass Custom Painted LRG Thread
Posted 17 March 2013 - 08:20 PM
I think a lot of the cheap toy collectors have strong feelings about customs being made in the first place... especially if they're anywhere near original colors. At least that's the sense I've gotten with the few I've met when the subject has come up. But yeah I wouldn't doubt if a certain winey bee-eye-itch or another jealous party said something.
Posted 17 March 2013 - 09:02 PM
Posted 17 March 2013 - 09:12 PM
Posted 26 March 2013 - 05:20 PM
Posted 05 June 2013 - 12:04 AM
Posted 05 June 2013 - 01:45 AM
I think Topps should at least lay off new characters that they NEVER MADE. Nasty Nick, Grim Jim, Murray Christmas and my other characters are are original artwork.It's fan art, the law says the creator of any intellectual property has an automatic copyright at the moment of creation. As soon as the work is fixed in a tangible medium of some sort (words on paper, a sculpture in any medium, a photo, etc.), all rights to it reside with its creator.Here is the example of the reverse: The same is not true of a photo of a sculpture. Because a sculpture is a three dimensional object, it can only be duplicated by means of three dimensional reproduction, i.e., casting copies of it. A two dimensional image on paper does not constitute a copy of a sculpture. It is a photograph, not a sculpture. Not only that, but a photograph only shows one view of the sculpture. It cannot equal the experience of walking around a sculpture, or picking it up and turning it around in one's hands. The utility of a sculpture lies in being able to perceive it's three-dimensionality first hand. That experience cannot be duplicated in a photograph, therefore, the photo is recognized as a completely different medium of expression and it is apparent that it is not the embodiment of the sculpture.Scratch-built toys based on existing characters, but not based on existing toys and either based on designs from comics or cartoons with no toy counterpart, or even entirely made up, would qualify as derivative works, because adapting a 2D design into a functional 3D toy constitutes a creative process that qualifies as an original expression of ideas.Transformers wiki
MISSING: Still Jill series 2 Cheap toy. It's not mine, but it might be yours. If willing please trade or sell to me. Thank you!