It makes it SO much easier for me.

Posted 24 May 2010 - 04:24 AM
Posted 24 May 2010 - 05:02 AM
Posted 24 May 2010 - 05:19 AM
Posted 24 May 2010 - 06:45 AM
Edited by nanoFatato, 24 May 2010 - 06:46 AM.
Posted 24 May 2010 - 09:25 AM
Ok, now that I'm sorting through pictures I need a little help. If anyone can answer these questions before the person I pose them too – that would be a huge help.
Doc:
The 7th picture (second from the left, bottom row) those figures are cosmix/exogini, right?
And the rest of the figures, that are MUSCLE sculpts, are random bootlegs?
Posted 24 May 2010 - 11:14 AM
Posted 25 May 2010 - 05:58 AM
Posted 25 May 2010 - 06:03 AM
First, thank you to all the people helping with this project. I actually feel overwhelmed with pictures and information – but that's a good thing and I hope it doesn't deter anyone from sending in pictures of their figures. I think this virtual collection is going to turn out great!
Among the list of questions I've already posted, I have one more. Do we include Exogini-type figures and Marty/Wolf figures?
As I've said before I see both sides of this argument. My belief is that we do not include the above mentioned figures. While I have several reasons for that belief, I think it hinges on two main points:
1. Marty and Wolf are creating custom pieces, not designed for mass retail. While both technically copy MUSCLE figures the goal is not to delude people into thinking they are authentic. I believe the majority of counterfeit MUSCLE figures were designed to be close enough to have parents and children not care or even not notice.
2. Exogini-like figures were released, unlicensed, by as an actual product. A company took the time to structure them as a brand for their company. I see them as similar to Uzay Star Wars figures. While both are unlicensed reproductions, their quality and comprehensiveness somehow given them a different identity than crudely made cheap knock-offs.
But as this is everyone's virtual collection I wanted to get a sense of what people thought.
Posted 25 May 2010 - 06:09 AM
Among the list of questions I've already posted, I have one more. Do we include Exogini-type figures and Marty/Wolf figures?
As I've said before I see both sides of this argument. My belief is that we do not include the above mentioned figures. While I have several reasons for that belief, I think it hinges on two main points:
1. Marty and Wolf are creating custom pieces, not designed for mass retail. While both technically copy MUSCLE figures the goal is not to delude people into thinking they are authentic. I believe the majority of counterfeit MUSCLE figures were designed to be close enough to have parents and children not care or even not notice.
2. Exogini-like figures were released, unlicensed, by as an actual product. A company took the time to structure them as a brand for their company. I see them as similar to Uzay Star Wars figures. While both are unlicensed reproductions, their quality and comprehensiveness somehow given them a different identity than crudely made cheap knock-offs.
But as this is everyone's virtual collection I wanted to get a sense of what people thought.
Posted 25 May 2010 - 08:26 AM
Posted 25 May 2010 - 04:13 PM
The customs should be not included too, they are not mass produced and they not have a wide distribution.
Posted 25 May 2010 - 05:02 PM
It's not really a matter of opinion actually. A rose by any other name is still a rose. "Customs" are unauthorized, exact copies of toy figures sold for profit. That also happens to what bootleg toys are, haha.I agree with his statment.
I have to say customs are not bootlegs.
Posted 25 May 2010 - 05:57 PM
It's not really a matter of opinion actually. A rose by any other name is still a rose. "Customs" are unauthorized, exact copies of toy figures sold for profit. That also happens to what bootleg toys are, haha.
The only question here is whether this type of bootleg MUSCLE should be included in Veers/Biffard's project.
Personally I think they should be included because TGB only ever reproduced popular MUSCLE sculpts such as MEAT, SC, Claw, and Sunshine. these also happen to be sculpts that weren't often reproduced by Asian bootleggers. in short, you may need TGB's figures to complete the set.
Posted 25 May 2010 - 06:09 PM
A bootleg is any unlicensed reproduction. Pretty straight forward.So what your saying is glow in the dark, mixed colors, GITD, growing, black light reactive, magetic or other type of attribute customs figures are bootlegs. It just dosent make any sense. They been customize in a way. It doesnt fall in a bootleg/counterfeit catagory.
Posted 25 May 2010 - 06:16 PM
Do we include Exogini-type figures and Marty/Wolf figures?
Edited by Biffard, 25 May 2010 - 06:18 PM.
Posted 25 May 2010 - 09:38 PM
Posted 26 May 2010 - 05:11 AM
Posted 26 May 2010 - 04:01 PM
A bootleg is any unlicensed reproduction. Pretty straight forward.
Posted 27 May 2010 - 01:35 PM
Edited by Ericnilla, 27 May 2010 - 01:37 PM.
Posted 29 May 2010 - 05:21 AM
In my opinion, this is the way to go.Ok, what I'm hearing is - the goal will be to complete the counterfeit set without Exogini-type figures nor figures made by Wolf and Marty.
However, if there comes a point where it appears that the set cannot be completed without those figures, then there are not any objections to using them. And the goal would still remain to replace and Exogini, Wolf, and/or Mart figures if they are ever used.
Posted 31 May 2010 - 04:36 PM
Want a window into my demented mind? toys, movies, cool stuff around the world @ http://cthuluconnect.blogspot.com/
DMT= insert universe into cannon, aim at brain, fire.
ユデッã‚ー - Yudekkii are you one? サタンクãƒã‚¹ æ°¸é ã«!(satan cross forever!)
é¢ç™½ã„!
Posted 01 June 2010 - 12:48 PM
I was re-reading the thread and it left me with one main question: Are we absolutely sure that pink #153 is a bootleg?Apparently you can narrow that list: Gilgar's find.
Posted 01 June 2010 - 12:56 PM