
28 Packs solved?!!!!
#1
Posted 27 March 2006 - 10:06 PM
Thug Busters:
10, 13, 17, 21, 24, 25, 26,
38, 43, 44, 48, 49, 51, 53,
54, 64, 67, 70, 72, 76, 78,
84, 90, 91, 95, 103, 161, 232
Cosmic Crunchers:
18, 45, 47, 79, 86, 88, 81,
83, 89, 92, 97, 105, 114, 120,
128, 129, 132, 144, 184, 188, 196,
192, 198, 200, 201, 202, 203, 205
Mighty Maulers:
5, 6, 12, 52, 57, 59, 63,
74, 80, 87, 94, 115, 169, 170,
171, 173, 175, 176, 193, 194, 204,
207, 209, 212, 214, 218, 226, 230
Cosmic Showdown:
4, 7, 8, 9, 32, 37, 62,
65, 66, 69, 98, 99, 119, 121,
122, 127, 130, 137, 142, 146, 147,
148, 150, 158, 159, 160, 162, 233
Here are the Results using my tree information. Complete means that the whole tree that I decoded was used.
Thug Busters:
Kinnikuman Part 2
U.S. Tree one: 17, 21, 26, 43, 44, 54, 67, 103 Complete
U.S. Tree two: 10, 13, 24, 25, 38, 48, 49, 51, 53 Complete
Kinnikuman Part 3
U.S. Tree three: 161 Complete
Kinnikuman Part 5
U.S. Tree three: 64, 72, 76, 90, 232 Complete
Kinnikuman Part 6
U.S. Tree one: 70, 78, 91 Complete
Kinnikuman Part 7
U.S. Tree one: 84, 95 Complete
OVERALL SCORE: PERFECT!!!!!
Cosmic Crunchers:
Kinnikuman Part 5
U.S. Tree two: 45, 83, 88, 89 Complete
U.S. Tree four: 79, 81, 132, 144 Complete
Kinnikuman Part 7
U.S. Tree three: 18, 47, 86, 92, 97, 114 Complete
Kinnikuman Part 10
U.S. Tree one: 120, 128, 129, 184 Complete
Kinnikuman Part 19
U.S. Tree one: 105, 188, 192, 196, 198, 200, 201, 202, 203, 205 Complete
OVERALL SCORE: PERFECT!!!!!
Mighty Maulers:
Kinnikuman Part 4
U.S. Tree one: 5, 6, 12, 52, 57, 59, 63, 74, 226, 230 Complete
Kinnikuman Part 6
U.S. Tree two: 80, 94 Complete
Kinnikuman Part 7
U.S. Tree two: 87, 115 Complete
Kinnikuman Part 17
U.S. Tree two: 169, 170, 171, 173, 175, 176 Complete
Kinnikuman Part 18
U.S. Tree one: 193, 194, 204, 207 Complete
Kinnikuman Part 20
U.S. Tree two: 209, 212, 214, 218 Complete
OVERALL SCORE: PERFECT!!!!!
Cosmic Showdown:
Kinnikuman Part 3
U.S. Tree one: 4, 7, 8, 62, 122 Complete
U.S. Tree two: 65, 66, 69, 130, 233 Complete
Kinnikuman Part 8
U.S. Tree two: 98, 99, 148, 150 Complete
U.S. Tree four: 37, 158, 160, 162 Complete
Kinnikuman Part 9
U.S. Tree two: 9, 146, 147, 159 Complete
Kinnikuman Part 12
U.S. Tree one: 32, 119, 121, 127, 137, 142 Complete
OVERALL SCORE: PERFECT!!!!!
Comments? Question? I was quite suprised myself at the accuracy of the color code!!!! Soupie has a copy of all my data and can confirm all of this himself, if anyone is concerned about it. Isn't this Great!!!! It's so Freaking Awesome!!!!
#2
Posted 27 March 2006 - 10:16 PM


I was banned! Read ALL about it! http://www.littlerub...showtopic=23333
#1 on the LRG Dishonest Members list!
#3
Posted 27 March 2006 - 10:19 PM
#4
Posted 27 March 2006 - 10:25 PM
#5
Posted 28 March 2006 - 03:09 AM
Your've been doing some in depth research , with a fair few hours thrown in i bet
i'm glad your theory has been validated , this also proves why these matters take so long to solve , No Bastar.d wants to put in the hard work!
Well done mate , i for one appreciate the effort.
Mischa
"Hobby" & "Mental illness"
................................................................................
................
I just want what every Muscle collector want's , MORE!
................................................................................
................
#7
Posted 28 March 2006 - 04:50 AM
Not sure if this helps, but my case of 144 four packs had several identicle four packs, on top of that, if they were not identicle they had the same colored muscles (for example, I was hoping for some purple and red claws, I got only 8 or so flesh claws). Can you imagine finding the case with all the purple claws, jackpot! Or the case with all the SR's hahahahaha.You said you had expected to find a pattern with the 28 packs, but why not with 4 packs and the Garbage Can?
#8
Posted 28 March 2006 - 08:04 AM
And which of you two are going to start writing the book?
And who'll do the introduction to the book and cover the history of MUSCLE collecting? I'd say Darren should do the intro, and Nate the Intro/History...
Or are we getting ahead of ourselves?
And you are here, with them, as so many specks of sand.
#10
Posted 28 March 2006 - 10:17 AM
Thanks man! I put my whole weekend into this data, and most of the hours were back to back, so I hope nobody thinks I did all of this in like 2 of 3 hours.Great work URS
Your've been doing some in depth research , with a fair few hours thrown in i bet
i'm glad your theory has been validated , this also proves why these matters take so long to solve , No Bastar.d wants to put in the hard work!
Well done mate , i for one appreciate the effort.
Mischa

#11
Posted 28 March 2006 - 10:23 AM
We already looked throught the 4 packs. Alex and myself. Other than the fact that a case contains pretty much the same lot of figures, they are not tied to any particular part. Each pack seemed to have figures from 4 different parts.Data from a case of unopened 4 packs might help with this question. Hmmm....Who do I know who has a factory case of unopened four packs.....Hmmm....
#12
Posted 28 March 2006 - 10:57 AM
#13
Posted 28 March 2006 - 11:01 AM
I didn't go through the whole case. I sampled 4 from each case. 4 colored 4 flesh and 4 halfers.So you found a mixture of figures from all 21 parts throughout a case? And not a large percentage of figures from the same few parts? The contents of each individual 4 pack isn't really as important as the whole cases figure content. Was any particular part more abundant than others within a case?
Full case data I don't have, other than maybe on a colored case, which I have almost a full one left. Half a case of halfers and not many left of the fleshies.
#14
Posted 28 March 2006 - 11:17 AM
#15
Posted 28 March 2006 - 12:12 PM
I'm quite interested to see how Satan Cross 4 packs pan out at this point...
Do you think distribution of figures in each pack could've changed in each of the tree waves?
for example, in a Pink pack, you find Hand, Mr. Tea, Kinnikuman, and Warsman, but for some reason, can't find that assortment in mixed or colored four packs?
And you are here, with them, as so many specks of sand.
#16
Posted 28 March 2006 - 12:41 PM
I think that makes sense.....

#17
Posted 28 March 2006 - 03:27 PM
#18
Posted 28 March 2006 - 04:00 PM